Abstract:
The development in genetic engineering has led to a proliferation of
large quantities and varieties of proteins, which are highly pure and free
from biological contaminants. In spite of their potency and specificity in
physiologic functions, most of the protein therapeutics is difficult to
administer clinically. Complexities of these agents demand an efficient
carrier system so that the physiochemical and biological properties
including molecular size, conformational stability, biological half-life,
immunogenicity, dose requirements, complex feed back control
mechanisms, susceptibility to break down in physical & biological
environments, requirements for specialized transport mechanisms across
biological membrane are duly controlled. In majority of the cases, chronic
therapy of these peptides and proteins is warranted. Generally, they have
an extremely short biological half-life. The inherent problems to
parenteral protein delivery are as follows. 1) Patient compliance (repeated
injections due to the short half-life). 2) Discomfort 3) Highly variable
bioavailability (both within and between subjects for molecules such as
subcutaneous insulin). 4) The non-physiological delivery pattern,
particularly of subcutaneous injections. Further, little increase in actual
drug delivered due to changes in dosage and/or mode of delivery may
cause down regulation of the desired response to most of the proteins. In
contrast, most often a pulsatile of flat delivery profile is required which
mimics the normal physiological rhythm. To address these problems a
great deal of research is being carried out to develop painless and
convenient methods for delivery of proteins and peptides utilizing the
approaches of novel drug delivery systems.
During the past few decades, one of the major goals for many
pharmaceutical scientists has been the discovery of a non-invasive
means of administering protein/peptide(s). To achieve this goal attempts
were made to deliver protein/peptides by various routes.
1.2 PER-ORAL DELIVERY OF PROTEINS AND PEPTIDES
Whilst oral administration of insulin is a potentially attractive
option, attempts to develop this route have, so far, met with little or no
success [Berger, 1993]. Polypeptide drugs, such as insulin, are degraded in the acidic environment of the stomach and by digestive enzymes,
especially in the small intestine. The epithelial surfaces of the
gastrointestinal tract itself present an effective barrier to the absorption
of insulin Table 1.1. Numerous individuals and combined strategies have
been devised to enhance insulin absorption. These include the coadministration
of insulin with enzyme inhibitors and/or permeation
enhancers, methods to improve insulin’s chemical stability and the use of
muco-bioadhesives, liposomes, emulsions and polymer-based delivery
systems [Damgé, 1991]. Despite many different strategies tried, generally
less than 1% of orally administered insulin is absorbed [Carino and
Mathiowitz, 1999].
1.2.1 Barriers for Oral Absorption of Protein/peptide(s)
There are several extracellular and intracellular barriers to
peptide/protein absorption. The oral bioavailability of most peptides and
proteins is less than 1%.
1.2.1.1 Luminal proteases and intracellular peptides
Peptide/protein hydrolysis is initiated in the stomach by pepsin I
and II (Erickson and Kim,1990) and continues in the lumen of the small
intestine by five potent pancreatic enzymes namely trypsin,
chymotrypsin, elastase, carboxypeptidase A(CA-P) and B(CP-B). The
specificities of these enzymes are complementary to each other and
convert proteins into polypeptides, peptides and mixture of amino acids.
1.2.1.2 Gastro intestinal anatomical barriers
The epithelial barrier rests on a basal lamina, a complex
macromolecular structure that is likely to act as a barrier to proteins.
(i) Oral and esophageal epithelium is made up of stratified squamous
epithelium. In keratinized portion, the intracellular space constitutes
oriented array of lamellae made up of neutral lipids with large proportion
of ceramide.
(ii) Gastrointestinal epithelium: It is lined with simple epithelium and
consisted of columnar cells (enterocytes or absorptive cell). These cells
are attached to each other by a complex apical junctional region
(Terminal web). It consists of most apical zonula occludes (Tight junction)
and distal zonula adherences (belt like dismosome attachment). They are attached to each other by inserted microfilaments of cytoskeleton. The
apical membrane of enterocytes is thrown in to series of microvilli. The apical tight junction around the enterocytes plays a critical
role by restricting paracellular pathway. Larger molecules may either
diffuse across or be actively transported into enterocytes via lateral and
basal membrane. The uptake is probably receptor-mediated endocytosis
with ganglioside and galactoproteins of the membrane acting as specific
ligands. (Linder et al., 1994).
1.2.2 Protein Absorption Mechanisms in the GI Tract
Multiple transport mechanisms are involved in peptide and protein
absorption in the GI tract. These mechanisms include
(1) transcellular passage through lipid regions
(2) transcellular carrier mediated transport
(3) pinocytosis (or endocytosis) and
(4) paracellular passage However, due to the large sizes of proteins, it is likely that they
pass the epithelium paracellularly or through “pores”. Therefore, proteins
from the extra cellular environment generally enter the cells via an
endocytic mechanism although few may cross cell membranes directly
(Doris & Maack, 1985).
1.2.2.1 Protein endocytosis
Many proteins have been shown to enter the GI epithelium by
endocytosis (Gonella & Newtra, 1984). There are essentially two types of
endocytosis-Fluid phase endocytosis or pinocytosis (non-specific
endocytosis) and adsorptive endocytosis (specific endocytosis).
Nonspecific endocytosis is the engulfing of extracellular fluid containing
dissolved proteins; specific endocytosis is a process of protein binding to
the cell membrane followed by internalization of vesicles.
Ligands can bind to either the apical or the basolateral membrane.
These two membranes are separated by the tight junction. After
internalization, membrane-bound ligands will be located in the apical or
the basolateral endosome. Endosome-entrapped ligands can be further
processed via the following pathways: (1) apical-to-basal or basal-toapical
transcytotic pathway (2) endosome-to-lysosome pathways, followed
by the degradation in lysosomes and releasing degraded products via
exocytotic and (3) recycling pathways which may or may not involve the
Golgi apparatus (Shen et al., 1992). Receptor mediated endocytosis is a
special case of adsorptive endocytosis. Phagocytosis is engulfment of
large particles (>0.5Hm) or molecular aggregates, that is also considered
as one form of endocytosis (Steinman et al., 1983). However, this process
is limited to specialized cells, such as macrophages and granulocytes.
(a) Receptor Mediated Endocytosis
The receptor-mediated process is common to virtually all
eukaryotic cells except the mature erythrocytes (Stahl & Schwartz, 1986).
The known receptors for mediating protein endocytosis are the GI tract
includes those for EGF, immunoglobulin and transferrin. The process
starts with the binding of macromolecules to cell surface receptors. These
bound complexes then move and cluster within the coated pits of plasma membranes. The pits pinch off from the membrane and form coated
vesicles for further intracellular processing.
(b) Passive Diffusion
Proteins may passively diffuse across the GI membranes and other
tissues as well. For example, insulin appears to be transported at least
partly by passive diffusion in rat intestine. There are two pathways of
passive diffusion-Transcellular and Paracellular. The paracellular spaces
are considered “pores” (Burton et al., 1991). The “pore” radius of the rat
intestinal mucosal cells is 4Å for lipid insoluble non- electrolytes.
(c) Para Cellular pathway
Tight junctions have some epithelia that are sensitive to hormonal
regulation and become leaky, facilitating paracellular pathway. This
mechanism has gained interest because of low proteolytic activity. This
depends on zonula occludens integrity and can be modified by lowering
extracelluar Ca+2 or enhancing Na+ transport and/or glucose and amino
acid transport.
(d) Phagocytosis by intestinal macrophages
Particles can be phagocytosed by gut macrophages within the
intestinal wall and pass intracellularly to the mesentric lymph nodes
(MLN). One Hm particles are transported (Wells et al., 1971) but
quantitatively it is insignificant transport.
(e) Protein Absorption in M Cells
M cells, found in peyer’s patches are considered responsible for the
most of the macromolecular absorption in the GI tract. This absorption is
the initial stage for the initiation of host immune responses. In M cells,
absorption of macromolecules by endocytosis is generally lower than in
the rest of enterocytes. Protein loaded microparticles also absorbed
largely in peyer’s patches than in non patches tissues.
1.2.2.2 Protein absorption via transcytosis
Transcytosis refers to the transport of internalized vesicles carrying
specifically or non-specifically adsorbed ligands or fluids from their sites
of entry to sites on the opposite surface of the cell with subsequent
release in a non-degraded form into the exracellular fluid. The main function of transcytosis is to redistribute macromolecules between
different biological compartments and to maintain cell polarity.